Notes: In contrast of other nonprinting characters, hidden text can be printed.See How to see/show a hidden text in a Word document and How to print a hidden text in a Word document. Smart quotes in word-processing software) were replaced with question marks or boxes.Why Don’t Screen Readers Always Read What’s on the Screen? Part 1: Punctuation and Typographic SymbolsSee Check the document for hidden information and 11 Shortcut Keys to control font format. There will a name or probably be your name or the name you have put in.Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. On the top of the page, you can see the document name and through the right side. Yellow triangle With a Exclamation Mark in Word: How to Fix Whenever you open a document in Microsoft Word, there you can see a blue banner at the top of the page.If a screen reader fails to read important text, the user will fail to understand it. Sometimes that’s OK, but sometimes that’s really bad. Click File from the Ribbon, then question mark (top right) or press F1 at any.Unfortunately, screen readers don’t always read what’s on the screen. If there’s one thing a screen reader ought to do really well, it’s read what’s on the screen.When you preparing to submit a Word document like a dissertation or thesis. That’s why they call them screen readers, right? You would think that screen reader software would have perfected the art of reading text by now, because that was the whole reason why screen readers were invented. They are shown as ¬.Screen readers are designed to do one thing: read what’s on the screen.
Question Mark For Word Document On Series Focuses OnPart 3 will focus on problems with pronunciation, including common content — like telephone numbers, dates, and abbreviations — as well as uncommon or new words, or words with more than one possible pronunciation.You Can’t Count on Screen Readers to Read Most Punctuation or Typographic SymbolsThe way screen readers treat punctuation is incredibly inconsistent from one screen reader to another, and there isn’t a single screen reader on the market that can reliably handle the full set of punctuation marks and typographical symbols that you might want to use. Part 2 will focus on the problems with inline semantic markup. Part 1 of this series focuses on the way screen readers read (or don’t read) punctuation and typographic symbols. It’s high time for screen reader programmers to fix these problems, and to get some consistency across brands of screen readers, because right now it’s kind of a mess… and I’m just talking about text, typographic symbols, and static HTML here: the things that screen readers are supposed to excel at reading. These are problems with the screen reader software itself.But every screen reader has major flaws in reading some aspect of typographical symbols. Screen readers will pause at commas rather than say “comma,” and screen readers will say “don’t” rather than say “don apostrophe t.” Those are reasonable decisions. Screen reader manufacturers have understandably decided that most users don’t need to hear every comma, period, and apostrophe in a document. If you use HTML entities or other special characters, you’ll hear even less.This is partly (but not entirely) by design.JAWS also reads the “less than or equal to” symbol incorrectly. Jaws incorrectly says “five dash two” when it should say “five minus two,” even when using the HTML entity − (not a regular dash) to specify the minus symbol. JAWS reads the plus symbol correctly, but not the minus symbol. It says “five two seven” when it should say “five plus two equals seven,” making it hard — or impossible — to write basic math expressions. Similarly, NVDA ignores the plus and equals symbols. This means web developers can’t use an asterisk to denote a required field on a form, unless they supplement the asterisk with some other NVDA-friendly method. Let users choose their own verbosity level, but the default level needs to be high enough for average users to get the information communicated in typical web content by the authors. I’m not saying to take away user preferences. I’m talking about the text and symbols right there on your keyboard, and the ones available in HTML entities and other standard character sets.It’s time for screen reader manufacturers to step up to the plate and design software that does a better job of actually reading what’s on the screen User Verbosity Preferences versus Default SettingsScreen readers have verbosity settings that let users choose how much punctuation to hear. I’m not talking about anything complicated here. There is too much potential for screen readers to miss out on the information that is right there in front of them. These are significant flaws in the most basic of screen reader functions: reading what’s on the screen. There’s no need to force a high verbosity level on all users.Even so, the verbosity probably should not be set so low by default that the screen reader can’t even read a URL correctly (for example, by not reading the colon or slashes), or convey even the most basic punctuation to readers. They may want to toggle the verbosity setting to “all punctuation” when reading code, and use a less verbose mode for reading prose. At the extreme end, blind web developers probably need to hear all the punctuation when reading HTML or JavaScript code, for example. By pausing instead of reading all punctuation, screen readers sound more natural and human-like, and that can be a good thing.But when the punctuation or typographic symbols convey important meaning, users need to be able to hear the punctuation and symbols, or the meaning will be lost. And sometimes users would rather hear a pause than hear every opening and closing parenthesis. It would be annoying to most users to hear every single comma or period in every sentence sentence, for example. Too many people will just assume that screen readers are always a little bit broken, and not bother to investigate workarounds, especially for the simplest tasks, like reading the text and punctuation on the screen. Such apathy is counter-productive to the goal of creating an accessible web. I’m not responsible, because I did my part by putting the text in there.” Screen Reader Flaws Breed ApathyScreen reader flaws breed apathy among web developers and content writers. It should read the text, but it doesn’t. That doesn’t seem right, and it leaves authors with a no-win choice of either stripping the document of nearly all punctuation for all users, or writing out everything in words instead of punctuation (like “1 plus 1 equals 2” instead of “1+1=2”), or simply saying “I don’t care what the screen reader does. Tuxera ntfs free for macJAWS , tested with Internet Explorer 9.0.23 on Windows 7 and Internet Explorer 11 on Windows 8 NVDA 2013.3, tested with Firefox 26.0 on Windows 7 Testing How Screen Readers Read Typographical SymbolsI knew that screen readers were inconsistent in the way they handled typographical symbols, but I didn’t know all of the intricate details of exactly what they did or didn’t read, so I set up some tests. I admit I sympathize with screen reader manufacturers when considering the scale of the task once you consider all possible character sets, but with just this limited set of common characters, the results are still disappointing. I’m not going to be that thorough. A more comprehensive test would involve different languages, all the characters in UTF-8, and all the HTML entities. I chose from among the more common characters characters that most English-speaking authors would expect screen readers to get right. The character encoding was UTF-8.I didn’t test every possible typographical character possible not even close. Psx emulator for mac os xHow is it that there are still bugs in screen reader software for reading basic text and typographical symbols? That’s something screen readers should have perfected long, long ago.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorBeth ArchivesCategories |